0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop

        ZDNet on downside of AI

        from the good-news-bad-news dept.
        Robert Trombatore writes "ZDNet's UK edition has an interesting article about AI. It's fairly well balanced and makes mention of Foresight Institute and its role in raising public awareness of emerging technologies."

        CP: Here's an excerpt: "Minsky agrees that extinction at the mechanical hands of a robot race may be just around the corner, but says that developments in the field of artificial intelligence call for considered debate. He says he is encouraging artificial intelligence experts to participate in the work of the Institute." You can do that here on nanodot, and at the upcoming Senior Associate Gathering.

        Arthur C. Clarke on nanotech and AI

        from the megabrains-via-nanotech dept.
        Scientific American reports Arthur C. Clarke's views on machine intelligence via nanotechnology: "Quoting himself (Clarke's third law), Clarke remarks that 'any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic; as technology advances it creates magic, and [AI is] going to be one of them.' Areas of research that target the ultimate in miniaturization, he adds, may be the key to making good minds. 'When nanotechnology is fully developed, they're going to churn [artificial brains] out as fast as they like.' "

        Automated conflict resolution for design process

        from the let-the-machine-figure-it-out dept.
        The nanotechnology design process can seem overwhelming in its complexity. Fortunately, efforts are already underway to automate the identification and resolution of design conflicts in today's systems, such as work by Shimon Nof at Purdue: "The aim is to create software tools that not only identify conflicts in advance but also describe fine details about the nature of those conflicts to better pinpoint a resolution. So far, experimental results have shown that such software tools are capable of eliminating the 'dependency on humans to execute critical design tasks' needed to resolve conflicts that arise in facility design, Nof says in a research paper about the work."

        BBC looks at AI, robots, and nanotech

        from the British-bravery dept.
        Skevos writes "The current online version of the BBC's In Business radio program is a feature looking at the future of robotics, and the program deals with nanotechnology and AI as well. The content is probably nothing new to readers of nanodot, but it's interesting to hear these issues being explored (rather cautiously) by a mainstream broadcaster. The host speaks to Hans Moravec, Ray Kurzweil, Bill Joy, and others, and runs for just under 30 minutes.

        You can find the Real Audio link to In Business here, or a direct link to the real audio file is here. I believe the program updates every Thursday, so the link probably won't work after Thursday 16 November 2000, or else it may lead to a different edition of the program. I recorded the show to a 6.6meg mp3 file for my own purposes, but I'm unaware of any easy or legal way of making it available to nanodot readers who miss out on it."

        Kurzweil's predictions at nanotech conference

        from the blunt-talk dept.
        Senior Associate John Gilmore forwarded a message from Politech about a Wired News story on Ray Kurzweil's talk at the Foresight Conference on Molecular Nanotechnology: "If he's right, exponential progress in science and engineering will allow us to merge with machines. We will become resistant to diseases, think faster, live better, and become transhuman in ways that would make even Superman green with envy…Identifying himself only as a graduate student in quantum computing, a bearded fellow questioned Kurzweil's commitment to humanity, saying 'this is the most hideous message that has been proposed in human history.' But most of the audience — if the widespread giggles during the question were any indication — seemed unalarmed."

        Human brain equivalence on a chip by 2005?

        from the smart-filing-cabinet dept.
        Senior Associate RobertBradbury writes "EE Times has a very interesting article about how the German startup Pact GmbH is producing a new microprocessor packing 128 32-bit arithmetic logic units. Initial models pack ~13 GigaOps, but they plan to go to 400 GigaOps (4*1014 ops) by 2002. This is putting you in the range of human brain equivalence as I discuss here. As they project a petaop (1015 ops) on a chip by 2010, even if the conservative estimates of brain ops (1017 ops) are correct, you will be able to get human brain equivalence in a filing cabinet sized machine this decade!" (CP: Apologies to Robert for the delay in posting; I was on vacation.)

        More on Robotics and Alife available

        from the My-they-move-fast,-don't-they? dept.

        The full text of a number of papers on evolutionary robotics design, artificial life (Alife), and swarm programming are available either online or as Acrobat PDF files as the "Feature of the Week" for the 31 August 2000 issue, on the website of the journal Nature.

        Items of recent interest include:

        Note: It is unclear how long Nature provides full access to articles in its "Feature of the Week" series; some past features several weeks old are still available, but others are not. Visit this site soon if you'd like to access or download these papers.

        Memories to seed machine intelligence

        from the machines-with-a-past? dept.
        Adam Brown writes "It has been theorized that in order for a computer to evolve its personality, it should have past memories to draw upon. While browsing the web I found the site randomaccessmemory.org which encourages members to post their life experiences and any memories that stand out in their mind. Could such a database be used as a starting seed for the implanted past memories of an AI persona? Does anybody else know of any similar resources?" CP: there's the separate question of whether seeding with human memories is a good idea…but if so, one could use biographies.

        Evolutionary AI software designs robot offspring

        from the early-"engineering-AI" dept.
        EddieWehri writes "Researchers developed a computer program that came up with designs for simple robots after being given simple parameters. Found on slashdot. http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWSScience 0008/30_robot.html" RalphMerkle explains that this refers to "recent work at Brandeis by Jordan Pollack. Evidently, this work involves a design system that uses evolutionary algorithms to design a robotic system."

        Update: A spate of press coverage of this research was set off by the publication of a paper by Pollack and co-worker Hod Lipson, also of Brandeis, in the 31 August 2000 issue of Nature. Some interesting press accounts include articles in the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times.

        Deep Blue leaves an indelible impression

        from the Do-you-know-me? dept.

        Three years after its widely-publicized chess match with Grand Master Garry Kasparov, IBM's Deep Blue computer system outranks many human celebrities in a poll of the public's familiarity with both human and machine personalities. A short article from the Associated Press on the Washington Post web site describes the study, which was conducted by Marketing Evaluation/TvQ, Inc.

        According to the article, even though Deep Blue's big public splash was in 1997, about 50 percent of those polled recognized Deep Blue's name — putting it on par with actress and "Baywatch babe" Carmen Electra, and slightly above CNN talk show host Larry King.

        Privacy Overview

        This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.